Throughput testing between Cisco 2802i and 3802i access points

I wanted to compare the throughput of Cisco 2802i and Cisco 3802i access points so that I can get some realistic stats on their performance.

Below report from Miercom is a good reference.

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise-networks/802-11ac-solution/miercom-report-cisco-aruba-wave.pdf

Below are the comparison charts for these 2 access points.

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 3.58.12 pm

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 3.58.21 pm

Test switches : Cisco Mig 3850 switch and Cisco 3850 U-poe switches

Access Points: Cisco 2802i and Cisco 3802i

Client Device: Mac book pro with 3 Spatial stream

Test scenario 1: Connected the Cisco 3802i access point into the MGig switch

Test scenario 2: Connected the Cisco 2802i access point into a 1Gig uplink switch

Below are the results for 160 MHz, 80 MHz, 40 MHz and 20 MHz respectively.

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 4.00.06 pm

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 4.00.29 pm

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 4.01.14 pm

Screen Shot 2017-08-11 at 4.01.27 pm

Results:

On 160 MHz :  The 3802i showed better results than 2802i but practically this bandwidth is not useable unless we just have one access point in that vicinity on 5 GHz radio.

On 80 MHz Channel: 2802i showed better consistent performance with data transfer touching 1 Gig.

3802i  managed to touch 800 Mbps on this bandwidth.

On 40 MHz Channel:  2802i showed better consistent performance with data transfer peaking at 900 Mbps and around 800 Mbps average

3802i  managed to touch 700 Mbps  and was around 600 Mbps average.

On 20 MHz Channel:  2802i showed better consistent performance with data transfer peaking and maintaining its transfer at 600 Mbps and 3802i touched 600 Mbps and was inconsistent with around 400 Mbps average.

Test method: Transfer huge files between a Mac connected to Wireless network to a remote server on wired network.

 

Next tests: Perform this throughput using IXIA on same switch platform to eliminate any hardware issues.

 

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s